Imperfect bipolarity: The ‘third power’ factor in Soviet-American relations in the nuclear field (1958–1968)

30 years after the end of Cold War, bipolar structure still dominates in nuclear sphere, although certain powers are closing gap with Russia and United States terms strategic arsenals system world politics general is moving towards polycentrism. At same time, as US-Russian relations continue to deteriorate against backdrop ‘Ukrainian crisis’, prospects for dialogue expiration Treaty on Measures Further Reduction Limitation Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) becoming increasingly vague. The absence a new agreement this field threatens throw international back beginning all ensuing consequences. To avoid such scenario, not only leaders should demonstrate political will, but other also be included negotiation process, particularly China. In regard, history War can provide valuable lessons. author argues that bipolarity (even at its apex late 1950s — early 1970s) had never been an exclusive characteristic relations. On basis number historical cases, paper demonstrates during period superpowers constantly reckon ‘third power’ factor. latter did influence logic dynamics Soviet-American relations, large extent predetermined direction nature their military development planning. Indeed, it was factor, namely China, along achievement parity between became one main impulses establishment non-proliferation regime. conclusion, focuses yet another important lesson from War: experience arms control negotiations suggests meetings politicians preceded by joint brainstorming sessions scholars interested countries. current situation, representatives academic community take lead so time climate eventually changes, there would already coherent viable options adapted realities.